Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 13:15:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A10E28988A156EC0E141780B0C289B34D39EFE6D336B6B6452D8C71796927AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed - the note declares the polling numbers to be wrong, but offers no evidence to doubt that the Gallego campaign got that result in their private polling. Polling averages often provide useful context, but are not counter-evidence that an internal poll exists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1776449013006385576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A10E28988A156EC0E141780B0C289B34D39EFE6D336B6B6452D8C71796927AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1712927756031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17764490130063855760A10E28988A156EC0E141780B0C289B34D39EFE6D336B6B6452D8C71796927AD