Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-05 18:06:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60056E22C47C282F9488A428AEA01EA88F83DF4C34F689DB38EF312BACBBB02F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ist wohl nicht als "Satire" gekennzeichnet worden. Ist es aber und frei erfunden. https://correctiv.org/checkjetzt/2019/03/28/studie-zu-iq-werten-von-waehlern-einzelner-parteien-ist-zweifelhaft/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1776222563812692184
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60056E22C47C282F9488A428AEA01EA88F83DF4C34F689DB38EF312BACBBB02F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712340370254
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177622256381269218460056E22C47C282F9488A428AEA01EA88F83DF4C34F689DB38EF312BACBBB02F