Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-05 06:16:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F4EFD831E119E5CA151F04473C497441E770465BE912FC679AF795631B76546
Participant Details

Original Note:

There are no factual errors in this post. While disingenuous, this doesn’t warrant a note. Both sides of the aisle do this all the time. Take it to the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1776043295824613458
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F4EFD831E119E5CA151F04473C497441E770465BE912FC679AF795631B76546
  • createdAtMillis - 1712297809382
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17760432958246134585F4EFD831E119E5CA151F04473C497441E770465BE912FC679AF795631B76546