Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 17:56:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE68130B04827B2A0F5461DAD1BC8B9C770D381DDFEA56A45ADEF5447871719F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die erste kollektive Anmerkungen "vergisst" einen wesentlichen Punkt: Universität Salzburg spricht von »kein RELEVANTES wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten«. Das bedeutet: Es GIBT Plagiate und vor Gericht siehts dann nicht so gut für Frau Doktor aus.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775943840672702875
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE68130B04827B2A0F5461DAD1BC8B9C770D381DDFEA56A45ADEF5447871719F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712253396332
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775943840672702875BE68130B04827B2A0F5461DAD1BC8B9C770D381DDFEA56A45ADEF5447871719F