Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-05 06:02:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17E145DB2585C5F73D482C0A78015D4F37726F1757EF547379800A4AB5B798D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die erste kollektive Anmerkungen "vergisst" einen wesentlichen Punkt: Universität Salzburg spricht von »kein RELEVANTES wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten«. Das bedeutet: Es GIBT Plagiate und vor Gericht siehts dann nicht so gut für Frau Doktor aus.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775943840672702875
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17E145DB2585C5F73D482C0A78015D4F37726F1757EF547379800A4AB5B798D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1712296974611
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177594384067270287517E145DB2585C5F73D482C0A78015D4F37726F1757EF547379800A4AB5B798D8