Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 18:48:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4689431091BD6B502EC5CBAE3AB9EFE2DBA0F6B0A82AE1E595D705036AFB0C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

In response to the second NNN note. Yes, NNN, but that is what the FBI confirmed, that it wasn’t an insurrection. Providing a definition for something that doesn’t change the note’s validity is essentially abusing CN. But yes. NNN. OP presents a personal opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775828577872982457
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4689431091BD6B502EC5CBAE3AB9EFE2DBA0F6B0A82AE1E595D705036AFB0C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1712256503972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775828577872982457B4689431091BD6B502EC5CBAE3AB9EFE2DBA0F6B0A82AE1E595D705036AFB0C4