Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 13:55:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C63B1F09346A237C95A494FD265CE4EEF6CC1C7F23E0ED6F53127C09EBEAB8DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post makes no mention of a "foreign court" and does not say anything about how the uk was a primary signatory or not. The proposed note makes suggestions that aren't even claims that the original post makes, thus the note is irrelevant and NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775824775249526888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C63B1F09346A237C95A494FD265CE4EEF6CC1C7F23E0ED6F53127C09EBEAB8DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1712238906148
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775824775249526888C63B1F09346A237C95A494FD265CE4EEF6CC1C7F23E0ED6F53127C09EBEAB8DB