Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 12:18:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 899D7128118B42AE5AEA3792C376828FE10572B2179E8AFAE05909C25C40B6B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post makes no mention of a "foreign court" and does not say anything about how the uk was a primary signatory or not. The proposed note makes suggestions that aren't even claims that the original post makes, thus the note is irrelevant and NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775824775249526888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 899D7128118B42AE5AEA3792C376828FE10572B2179E8AFAE05909C25C40B6B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1712233083554
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775824775249526888899D7128118B42AE5AEA3792C376828FE10572B2179E8AFAE05909C25C40B6B2