Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-06 06:57:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7C96E062087B42256E680BA561B2C5CE357F9C44AB20C0C1CCB171EAE59ED72
Participant Details

Original Note:

The USA voted against the resolution because it “also contains many unbalanced, inaccurate, and unwise provisions” and it “[did] not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger”. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775787038924489056
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7C96E062087B42256E680BA561B2C5CE357F9C44AB20C0C1CCB171EAE59ED72
  • createdAtMillis - 1712386635974
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775787038924489056A7C96E062087B42256E680BA561B2C5CE357F9C44AB20C0C1CCB171EAE59ED72