Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 04:53:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A419A470E95C5D0B180533D54BDA77E35EB39EEEA6B0466F77FCC321C02E1A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ECHR and not the Refugee Convention was the primary legal basis. As the Supreme Court said at [44]-[49] the test it had to apply came from ECHR case law, in particular the Ilias v Hungary case Source: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/uksc/2023/42

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775648834766438598
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A419A470E95C5D0B180533D54BDA77E35EB39EEEA6B0466F77FCC321C02E1A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1712206436581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17756488347664385987A419A470E95C5D0B180533D54BDA77E35EB39EEEA6B0466F77FCC321C02E1A3