Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 00:17:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D16800B03E1E2A473C365BF418059645586E73802F1DA0CDD2634EE7FDCB9CCC
Participant Details

Original Note:

A mão de obra fazia parte da rotulação de dados para machine learning. A meta era uma intervenção de 0,5%, mas na prática foi cerca de 70%. Diferentemente do que se leva a entender, os humanos faziam uma conferência manual do que a IA realizou, e não todo trabalho: https://www.theinformation.com/articles/how-amazons-big-bet-on-just-walk-out-stumbled

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775628837751083274
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D16800B03E1E2A473C365BF418059645586E73802F1DA0CDD2634EE7FDCB9CCC
  • createdAtMillis - 1712189872483
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775628837751083274D16800B03E1E2A473C365BF418059645586E73802F1DA0CDD2634EE7FDCB9CCC