Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-05 11:50:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, this traffic report is no different from any other prior traffic report, and as such has value as it compares same set of data chronologically. Whether the traffic is “real people” or is irrelevant in this case.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775563639761576008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712317805971
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775563639761576008970C3483905F4685550260C88D0ED16A7BCBC6752BA6A1351AAB29D6683AA03F