Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-03 17:18:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D057CFAD76D8F3BAD9CDB59C61FADC4EFFA2177C327B09A308AC9492BE03EF28
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Zitat von Kuhr aus dem ursprünglichen Artikel soll Seriosität bezüglich J Stirling vermitteln. Allerdings ist der besagte Stirling in der Vergangenheit schon mehrfach durch falsche Dateninterpretationen aufgefallen, die weitestgehend widerlegt wurden. Er gilt als unseriös. https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/analysis-insurance-josh-stirling-misrepresents-official-uk-data-doesnt-show-covid19-vaccines-600000-deaths/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775534578037305549
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D057CFAD76D8F3BAD9CDB59C61FADC4EFFA2177C327B09A308AC9492BE03EF28
  • createdAtMillis - 1712164724389
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775534578037305549D057CFAD76D8F3BAD9CDB59C61FADC4EFFA2177C327B09A308AC9492BE03EF28