Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-03 18:02:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC2B4BF5748438351F29B153B2B968E2D63FF1ADBDE6D32E1CAF248E3EC907F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

O polígrafo tem sua fiabilidade comprovada e se mostrou eficiente em diversos casos. É interessante ressaltar a margem de 90% de acerto do instrumento, se distanciando muito da ideia de uma fraude ou "arma" do sistema como o autor do post alega. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/o-teste-do-poligrafo-tem-alguma-base-cientifica/823635454/amp&ved=2ahUKEwjKp7ek3KSFAxXLK7kGHTcvCuQQFnoECA0QBQ&usg=AOvVaw2S9yuBf_pwxSd34b6w_7L7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775312170311377180
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC2B4BF5748438351F29B153B2B968E2D63FF1ADBDE6D32E1CAF248E3EC907F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1712167344455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775312170311377180EC2B4BF5748438351F29B153B2B968E2D63FF1ADBDE6D32E1CAF248E3EC907F6