Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 18:48:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Não é possível dizer de antemão se "CPI analisa o relatório de Textor", já que CPIs são imprevisíveis. CPIs produzem AO FINAL do trabalho um relatório próprio. E a CPI ainda nem começou.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775228179239637484
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1712083680135
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17752281792396374847A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC