Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-03 08:49:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DD865328D03FAE3DB042A388E36F9FD6738721E9F58ECBD746D6C98EE35C32E
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'explication de Tixier est erronée par le simple fait qu'il a fait le choix d'ignorer les achats initiaux des actionnaires et ne prends en compte que les achats d'actions d'une année sur l'autre. Cela invalide totalement l'explication. Voir aussi : https://twitter.com/pierre_jacquel2/status/1775167891794792840

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1775215106986582179
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9DD865328D03FAE3DB042A388E36F9FD6738721E9F58ECBD746D6C98EE35C32E
createdAtMillis - 1712134193738
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17752151069865821799DD865328D03FAE3DB042A388E36F9FD6738721E9F58ECBD746D6C98EE35C32E