Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 21:03:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 24414F17BF11DCCF877A1FF5ACAB2BBDF4C1FA7123097352321C20D3C8160402
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'explication de Tixier est erronée par le simple fait qu'il a fait le choix d'ignorer les achats initiaux des actionnaires et ne prends en compte que les achats d'actions d'une année sur l'autre. Cela invalide totalement l'explication. Voir aussi : https://twitter.com/pierre_jacquel2/status/1775167891794792840

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775215106986582179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 24414F17BF11DCCF877A1FF5ACAB2BBDF4C1FA7123097352321C20D3C8160402
  • createdAtMillis - 1712091795316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177521510698658217924414F17BF11DCCF877A1FF5ACAB2BBDF4C1FA7123097352321C20D3C8160402