Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 16:37:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFA0DCAAF033B50DF14A1DF05928B55BCA71C5E6DC4429613B0E3FE538C1E2AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note on the historian's creditials is incredibly misleading. If you read the entirety of the link provided in the note, she's an expert on more than just gender studies, with relevant historical background in Japanese history within the relevant time-frame.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775193435000963301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BFA0DCAAF033B50DF14A1DF05928B55BCA71C5E6DC4429613B0E3FE538C1E2AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1712075830256
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775193435000963301BFA0DCAAF033B50DF14A1DF05928B55BCA71C5E6DC4429613B0E3FE538C1E2AB