Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 17:33:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59D78E57BD54EBCA6F13FB54D1CE13EB54C904570B07128C57C5D371F1DAB670
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note on the historian's creditials is incredibly misleading. If you read the entirety of the link provided in the note, she's an expert on more than just gender studies, with relevant historical background in Japanese history within the relevant time-frame.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775193435000963301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59D78E57BD54EBCA6F13FB54D1CE13EB54C904570B07128C57C5D371F1DAB670
  • createdAtMillis - 1712079225189
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177519343500096330159D78E57BD54EBCA6F13FB54D1CE13EB54C904570B07128C57C5D371F1DAB670