Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 20:03:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A756C273AB917C36BC327E4CEF8B5B11988BF577D2839218120602906A3D750
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note on the historian's creditials is incredibly misleading. If you read the entirety of the link provided in the note, she's an expert on more than just gender studies, with relevant historical background in Japanese history within the relevant time-frame.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775193435000963301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A756C273AB917C36BC327E4CEF8B5B11988BF577D2839218120602906A3D750
  • createdAtMillis - 1712088203099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17751934350009633014A756C273AB917C36BC327E4CEF8B5B11988BF577D2839218120602906A3D750