Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 16:44:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BEC3F3624450FAD7A4F83D290273FA56252170F43846C54F8744448F71A6946
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note on the historian's creditials is incredibly misleading. If you read the entirety of the link provided in the note, she's an expert on more than just gender studies, with relevant historical background in Japanese history within the relevant time-frame.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775193435000963301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BEC3F3624450FAD7A4F83D290273FA56252170F43846C54F8744448F71A6946
  • createdAtMillis - 1712076244716
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17751934350009633012BEC3F3624450FAD7A4F83D290273FA56252170F43846C54F8744448F71A6946