Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 15:55:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54E942CF6BD0E05EF562553AECB61F9EBD32B65B37D3767BA60050AC6456FE4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

I have not down graded any of the CNs, however I was beyond shocked to see EVERY CN is using Wikipedia as a source One has another source Wikipedia is not a reliable source It's not accepted as a reliable source because it can be and at times altered - at any given moment https://www.makeuseof.com/why-wikipedia-not-as-credible-you-think/ https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-as-wikipedia-turns-20-how-credible-is-it/a-56228222

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775188348413546788
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 54E942CF6BD0E05EF562553AECB61F9EBD32B65B37D3767BA60050AC6456FE4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1712073306318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177518834841354678854E942CF6BD0E05EF562553AECB61F9EBD32B65B37D3767BA60050AC6456FE4B