Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 23:46:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ivermectin is effective for parasites but not c19. Many studies have proven this Kory's papers have been retracted. His MATH+ paper because the data was shown to be false. He receives payments from the FLCCC which promotes IVM for c19. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0885066620973585 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947948/ https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2801827 https://www.kumc.edu/about/news/news-archive/jama-ivermectin-study.html https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362 https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/news/moru-study-shows-ivermectin-not-effective-treatment-against-covid https://www.lstmed.ac.uk/news-events/news/ivermectin-for-covid-19-review-update-11-trials-and-no-evidence-of-benefit-shown https://www.medsci.ox.ac.uk/news/study-supports-evidence-ivermectin-not-effective-to-treat-covid-19 https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/ivermectins-race-is-run-as-studies-all-point-to-the-same-conclusion/ https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/ivermectin-hasnt-proven-effective-covid-19-so-far-despite-persistent-online-claims/ https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/study-high-dose-ivermectin-not-effective-for-outpatients-with-covid-19 https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775175525335806400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
  • createdAtMillis - 1712101595694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17751755253358064000A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D