Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 15:22:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4909561772A4BE40B2FB0663123A6F7005C1AFFA6280AADD8BF5AAC22A020B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article already contains the information in the proposed note, citing the "'de-identified and aggregated data' of movement trends in Canada." The post makes no claim at all to the contrary of the factual information in the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775140988152930638
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4909561772A4BE40B2FB0663123A6F7005C1AFFA6280AADD8BF5AAC22A020B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1712071328428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775140988152930638E4909561772A4BE40B2FB0663123A6F7005C1AFFA6280AADD8BF5AAC22A020B4