Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-03 11:13:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9E3D71BAA6A88274F6FFE37B58A933F9757A39EF00BE9E12524D744618E64EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Frolicsome Moon Ostrich: Asserting that strong academic evidence exists to support a claim which refutes the post’s claim isn’t an expression of personal opinion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki#Support https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki#cite_note-20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775093617893200171
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9E3D71BAA6A88274F6FFE37B58A933F9757A39EF00BE9E12524D744618E64EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1712142787800
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775093617893200171C9E3D71BAA6A88274F6FFE37B58A933F9757A39EF00BE9E12524D744618E64EA