Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 18:18:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Frolicsome Moon Ostrich: Asserting that strong academic evidence exists to support a claim which refutes the post’s claim isn’t an expression of personal opinion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki#Support https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki#cite_note-20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775093617893200171
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF
  • createdAtMillis - 1712081911651
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177509361789320017161C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF