Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 16:56:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6981D0A61D9E0F8DB900A953C8F42BAB37E98071D0005AE5A8D93F4DB442779D
Participant Details

Original Note:

La lecture rapide n'est pas reconnue scientifiquement. "Je ne vois pas comment on peut aller aussi vite, sans perdre en compréhension", estime Saveria Colonna, professeure en sciences du langage à l’université Paris 8. Source : https://www.francetvinfo.fr/culture/livres/vrai-ou-faux-la-lecture-rapide-permet-elle-de-comprendre-tout-ce-qu-on-lit_6064686.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775077132357574799
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6981D0A61D9E0F8DB900A953C8F42BAB37E98071D0005AE5A8D93F4DB442779D
  • createdAtMillis - 1712076990305
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17750771323575747996981D0A61D9E0F8DB900A953C8F42BAB37E98071D0005AE5A8D93F4DB442779D