Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 11:31:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FEA5670A4E84584423BBE2B3786501841FF65F23BA32EE926FBF68F00E127308
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hans Eysencks work was deemed unreliable because he was funded by the tobacco industry. He was still alive by then. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/eysenck-took-pounds-800-000-tobacco-funds-1361007.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Eysenck

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775052283086037090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FEA5670A4E84584423BBE2B3786501841FF65F23BA32EE926FBF68F00E127308
  • createdAtMillis - 1712057485267
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775052283086037090FEA5670A4E84584423BBE2B3786501841FF65F23BA32EE926FBF68F00E127308