Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 06:37:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD0D52269A62DC615C374607D79469D2032EE768E71641D018A8DA3017AA6A1B
Participant Details

Original Note:

No existe evidencia científica que respalde la efectividad de la grafología,​ por lo que es considerada una pseudociencia y una práctica científicamente cuestionable. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafolog%C3%ADa https://hablandodeciencia.com/el-timo-de-la-grafologia/ https://beaglenauta.wordpress.com/2018/02/14/desmintiendo-una-pseudociencia-la-grafologia/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775048545978007577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD0D52269A62DC615C374607D79469D2032EE768E71641D018A8DA3017AA6A1B
  • createdAtMillis - 1712039822906
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775048545978007577CD0D52269A62DC615C374607D79469D2032EE768E71641D018A8DA3017AA6A1B