Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 13:07:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B05BFFCE2CEBCE75B79B4CB1D9A1018E825277BBA9A032919DA3279DA9448F1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

No existe evidencia científica que respalde la efectividad de la grafología,​ por lo que es considerada una pseudociencia y una práctica científicamente cuestionable. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafolog%C3%ADa https://hablandodeciencia.com/el-timo-de-la-grafologia/ https://beaglenauta.wordpress.com/2018/02/14/desmintiendo-una-pseudociencia-la-grafologia/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775048545978007577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B05BFFCE2CEBCE75B79B4CB1D9A1018E825277BBA9A032919DA3279DA9448F1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1712063254203
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1775048545978007577B05BFFCE2CEBCE75B79B4CB1D9A1018E825277BBA9A032919DA3279DA9448F1C