Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 14:40:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 097C9B15FFF382652EFBCDDEFBA21336CEC14B39F88947ADDB394FB2667642C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista omite o fato do caso Gabriela Hardt ter formado maioria no CNJ pelo arquivamento há anos, só não sendo arquivado por conta de uma série de manobras processuais, como pedidos de vista sucessivos, como consta na própria sessão do CNJ (a partir das 3 horas e 8 min): https://t.co/5JiMUsE5OB

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774828263937864009
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 097C9B15FFF382652EFBCDDEFBA21336CEC14B39F88947ADDB394FB2667642C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1712068802827
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1774828263937864009097C9B15FFF382652EFBCDDEFBA21336CEC14B39F88947ADDB394FB2667642C7