Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 02:48:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0EC6C86CC31DBED1DB9AC800DB1D71E5388585426C9DB19E4F97037533B7888
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista omite o fato do caso Gabriela Hardt ter formado maioria no CNJ pelo arquivamento há anos, só não sendo arquivado por conta de uma série de manobras processuais, como pedidos de vista sucessivos, como se explicita na própria sessão do CNJ: https://t.co/5JiMUsE5OB

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774823034223829504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0EC6C86CC31DBED1DB9AC800DB1D71E5388585426C9DB19E4F97037533B7888
  • createdAtMillis - 1712026139110
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1774823034223829504F0EC6C86CC31DBED1DB9AC800DB1D71E5388585426C9DB19E4F97037533B7888