Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 20:14:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2CE4870B3E4C0895EA7BEDDEDD4FDAA6C9CC1111563E0F028F897F48674CE56
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista omite o fato do caso Gabriela Hardt ter formado maioria no CNJ pelo arquivamento há anos, só não sendo arquivado por conta de uma série de manobras processuais, como pedidos de vista sucessivos, como se explicita na própria sessão do CNJ: https://t.co/5JiMUsE5OB

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774823034223829504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2CE4870B3E4C0895EA7BEDDEDD4FDAA6C9CC1111563E0F028F897F48674CE56
  • createdAtMillis - 1712002465924
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774823034223829504E2CE4870B3E4C0895EA7BEDDEDD4FDAA6C9CC1111563E0F028F897F48674CE56