Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 19:42:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista omite o fato do caso Gabriela Hardt ter formado maioria no CNJ pelo arquivamento há anos, só não sendo arquivado por conta de uma série de manobras processuais, como pedidos de vista sucessivos, como se explicita na própria sessão do CNJ: https://t.co/5JiMUsE5OB

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774823034223829504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1712000523126
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17748230342238295047A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC