Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 12:51:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07C88040FF2925D54611AA34D84338F77CD8BEC7DCC601179248FF3F14753B73
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista omite o fato do caso Gabriela Hardt ter formado maioria no CNJ pelo arquivamento há anos, só não sendo arquivado por conta de uma série de manobras processuais, como pedidos de vista sucessivos, como se explicita na própria sessão do CNJ: https://t.co/5JiMUsE5OB

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774823034223829504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07C88040FF2925D54611AA34D84338F77CD8BEC7DCC601179248FF3F14753B73
  • createdAtMillis - 1712062284108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177482303422382950407C88040FF2925D54611AA34D84338F77CD8BEC7DCC601179248FF3F14753B73