Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 05:29:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAE88299FD6D64CCAEE109446ADD2A6AD9A832716A3B05F9F115DA320EC4D45C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Judge Engeron did not value Mar a Lago at $18M. A county assesor dis. Also, the exact figure was not important. The decision was only that it is NOT worth the claimed $1.5B, with most experts putting it around $300M. https://nypost.com/2023/10/02/judge-implores-media-to-stop-saying-he-valued-mar-a-lago-at-18m/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774796351961972747
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BAE88299FD6D64CCAEE109446ADD2A6AD9A832716A3B05F9F115DA320EC4D45C
  • createdAtMillis - 1712035775077
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774796351961972747BAE88299FD6D64CCAEE109446ADD2A6AD9A832716A3B05F9F115DA320EC4D45C