Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 16:35:41 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE25333669F4DF2E27D14A9F975205963731F1CA4E6483106765CCD8B2605F4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Deze claim die door NOS als feit wordt gerepresenteerd is gebaseerd op pseudoscience en bewuste misleiding. Er gaat teveel mis om in 280 tekens samen te vatten. Lees o.a. dit paper: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774721532884930959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE25333669F4DF2E27D14A9F975205963731F1CA4E6483106765CCD8B2605F4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1711989341387
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774721532884930959FE25333669F4DF2E27D14A9F975205963731F1CA4E6483106765CCD8B2605F4D