Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 10:21:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA7FB49CD74B99925F405E6088C365E3E96AB0EAB6C297EDE47298B6C42E848E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Deze claim die door NOS als feit wordt gerepresenteerd is gebaseerd op pseudoscience en bewuste misleiding. Er gaat teveel mis om in 280 tekens samen te vatten. Lees o.a. dit paper: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774721532884930959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA7FB49CD74B99925F405E6088C365E3E96AB0EAB6C297EDE47298B6C42E848E
  • createdAtMillis - 1711966882923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1774721532884930959CA7FB49CD74B99925F405E6088C365E3E96AB0EAB6C297EDE47298B6C42E848E