Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 21:49:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6CFE6A823458E47258CCA7D6CFDDD214ECAE645840EA7EC1CA0886B4406E3764
Participant Details

Original Note:

Deze claim die door NOS als feit wordt gerepresenteerd is gebaseerd op pseudoscience en bewuste misleiding. Er gaat teveel mis om in 280 tekens samen te vatten. Lees o.a. dit paper: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774721532884930959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6CFE6A823458E47258CCA7D6CFDDD214ECAE645840EA7EC1CA0886B4406E3764
  • createdAtMillis - 1712008153568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17747215328849309596CFE6A823458E47258CCA7D6CFDDD214ECAE645840EA7EC1CA0886B4406E3764