Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 09:12:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Deze claim die door NOS als feit wordt gerepresenteerd is gebaseerd op pseudoscience en bewuste misleiding. Er gaat teveel mis om in 280 tekens samen te vatten. Lees o.a. dit paper: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774721532884930959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E
  • createdAtMillis - 1711962750850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177472153288493095964C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E