Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 08:57:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43CDA3E79E7F20B741E31B47D39944CE817C4DEA1BFC9275920065347875C86E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Deze claim die door NOS als feit wordt gerepresenteerd is gebaseerd op pseudoscience en bewuste misleiding. Er gaat teveel mis om in 280 tekens samen te vatten. Lees o.a. dit paper: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774721532884930959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43CDA3E79E7F20B741E31B47D39944CE817C4DEA1BFC9275920065347875C86E
  • createdAtMillis - 1711961848051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 177472153288493095943CDA3E79E7F20B741E31B47D39944CE817C4DEA1BFC9275920065347875C86E