Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 21:16:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15750B516EEDBE161281CCEF259F07C33057A0AF7A717CCBCEF20FD708C0013C
Participant Details

Original Note:

There are no sources to back up this claim. Latest update: https://www.ft.com/content/158f8524-96cf-46a4-8d55-4303882c8eed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774692900024025278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15750B516EEDBE161281CCEF259F07C33057A0AF7A717CCBCEF20FD708C0013C
  • createdAtMillis - 1712006170028
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177469290002402527815750B516EEDBE161281CCEF259F07C33057A0AF7A717CCBCEF20FD708C0013C