Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 10:31:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0265548B1595D1876EEED81AD5D71156B00A1B7EEC718BC474E24836D3552C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Although the note is correct in stating how notes work, it does show a weakness of the CN algo where objectively correct notes are not shown because right amount of community members voted "not helpful", even though it is. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/why-twitters-community-notes-feature-mostly-fails-to-combat-misinformation/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774515809097814020
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0265548B1595D1876EEED81AD5D71156B00A1B7EEC718BC474E24836D3552C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1711967506020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774515809097814020F0265548B1595D1876EEED81AD5D71156B00A1B7EEC718BC474E24836D3552C3