Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-31 19:15:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 253A481B560F866AF0213C54FC56BFF2C0ABC6930662E47534DF4E54D6E09140
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Although the note is correct in stating how notes work, it does show a weakness of the CN algo where objectively correct notes are not shown because right amount of community members voted "not helpful", even though it is. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/why-twitters-community-notes-feature-mostly-fails-to-combat-misinformation/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774515809097814020
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 253A481B560F866AF0213C54FC56BFF2C0ABC6930662E47534DF4E54D6E09140
  • createdAtMillis - 1711912537475
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774515809097814020253A481B560F866AF0213C54FC56BFF2C0ABC6930662E47534DF4E54D6E09140