Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-31 20:42:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP is referencing an old article which has some methodological problems and quotes incorrect figures. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010243318426 This article gives a detailed explanation of the issues. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02540-7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774323776815075812
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
  • createdAtMillis - 1711917744187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177432377681507581230B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578