Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-24 04:03:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84A07F91A2AFB5815A45F2FE246A19321E1F1605FDE876A35D024D18A6FBD285
Participant Details

Original Note:

I agree the lawsuit is stupid and the answer is obvious, but whether or not their conduct violated the law is the entire point of the trial. CNs are for correcting misinformation, and as of right now whether or not the conduct was illegal is a matter of opinion. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774133002634965018
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84A07F91A2AFB5815A45F2FE246A19321E1F1605FDE876A35D024D18A6FBD285
  • createdAtMillis - 1719201797479
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177413300263496501884A07F91A2AFB5815A45F2FE246A19321E1F1605FDE876A35D024D18A6FBD285