Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-01 18:10:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F9BDD9B781933D2E17362493D2D4FDCA25DFCF13789310A40EB52A6ECC52401
Participant Details

Original Note:

I agree the lawsuit is stupid and the answer is obvious, but whether or not their conduct violated the law is the entire point of the trial. CNs are for correcting misinformation, and as of right now whether or not the conduct was illegal is a matter of opinion. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774133002634965018
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F9BDD9B781933D2E17362493D2D4FDCA25DFCF13789310A40EB52A6ECC52401
  • createdAtMillis - 1711995015486
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17741330026349650182F9BDD9B781933D2E17362493D2D4FDCA25DFCF13789310A40EB52A6ECC52401