Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 18:48:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E849D3975D220835BA6FB9171ED9FA36C4B74B65ED592CF7986B189A8B711E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

I agree the lawsuit is stupid and the answer is obvious, but whether or not their conduct violated the law is the entire point of the trial. CNs are for correcting misinformation, and as of right now whether or not the conduct was illegal is a matter of opinion. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774133002634965018
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E849D3975D220835BA6FB9171ED9FA36C4B74B65ED592CF7986B189A8B711E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1711824534316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17741330026349650181E849D3975D220835BA6FB9171ED9FA36C4B74B65ED592CF7986B189A8B711E1