Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 16:50:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A85083D52D85B572D0DD4DDF6DDC16F9C929DEACBA74DE9A504574226BF1217
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's shown, especially during a normal user experience, that most of these "users" are bots rather than human users. (1) This issue has been known for a long while, with articles going back to September (2) stating there is a widespread bot problem. (1) https://techcrunch.com/2024/01/10/it-sure-looks-like-x-twitter-has-a-verified-bot-problem/ (2) https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/09/x-twitter-bots-republican-primary-debate-tweets-increase

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774129921683505471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A85083D52D85B572D0DD4DDF6DDC16F9C929DEACBA74DE9A504574226BF1217
  • createdAtMillis - 1712249455339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17741299216835054714A85083D52D85B572D0DD4DDF6DDC16F9C929DEACBA74DE9A504574226BF1217