Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 22:00:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3E4F738F8D433ED955BB4249B345658D154AA02465E5B457998EA04400F2312
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article at no point references skin colour when talking about British birth rates. The comment is likely to generate X impressions on the commenter’s accounts and employs a ‘shock tactic’ to do so. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/874a2d65-8938-4433-a58b-adf3c62535e7?shareToken=b2d434fa7b78f875b0a56535ed4f28f3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774061375876128817
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3E4F738F8D433ED955BB4249B345658D154AA02465E5B457998EA04400F2312
  • createdAtMillis - 1711836004876
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1774061375876128817C3E4F738F8D433ED955BB4249B345658D154AA02465E5B457998EA04400F2312